首页> 外文OA文献 >Four foundation stones for a real integration of social and environmental factors in risk/impact assessments of development projects
【2h】

Four foundation stones for a real integration of social and environmental factors in risk/impact assessments of development projects

机译:在发展项目的风险/影响评估中真正整合社会和环境因素的四个基石

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the last twenty years, both the increase in academic production and the expansion of professional involvement in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Social Impact Assessment (SIA), have evidenced growing scientific and business interest in risk and impact analysis. However, this growth has not brought with it a parallel progress in addressing their main shortcomings: insufficient integration of environmental and social features into development project analyses and, in cases where the social aspects are considered, technical-methodological failings in their diagnosis and assessment. It is clear that these weaknesses carry with them substantial threats to the sustainability (social, environmental and economic) of schemes which impact on the environment, and in consequence, to the local contexts where they are carried out and to the delicate balance of the global ecosystem. This paper argue that, in a sociological context of growing complexity, four foundation-stones are required to underpin research methodologies (for both diagnosis and assessment) in the socio-environmental risks of development projects: a theoretical foundation in actor-network theory; an ethical grounding in values which are internationally recognized though not always carried through into practice; a (new) epistemological-scientific base; and a methodological foundation in social participation.
机译:在过去的二十年中,学术成果的增加和环境影响评估(EIA)和社会影响评估(SIA)的专业参与的扩大,都证明了科学和商业界对风险和影响分析的兴趣与日俱增。但是,这种增长并没有带来解决其主要缺点的并行进展:将环境和社会特征未充分纳入发展项目分析中,以及在考虑到社会方面的情况下,其诊断和评估技术方法上的缺陷。显然,这些弱点给计划的可持续性(社会,环境和经济)带来了极大的威胁,这些计划影响环境,进而影响执行这些计划的当地环境以及全球的微妙平衡。生态系统。本文认为,在日益复杂的社会学背景下,需要四个基础来支撑开发项目的社会环境风险的研究方法(用于诊断和评估):行为者网络理论的理论基础;具有国际认可的价值观的道德基础,尽管这种价值观并不总是付诸实践; (新的)认识论科学基础;以及社会参与的方法论基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号